Tuesday, 25 February 2014

A thing of annoyance...

The Grumpy Gentleman David Cutting
 Thank heavens for for highway patrol” 


It’s like a long, tubular petri dish. One great travelling incubator of scum, filth and sorrow. The 5:45am rail service from Gosford to Sydney. The misery machine skulks its way through the Kuring-Gai national park along a similar line to the M1 freeway but I can’t wind the window down anymore, nor can I turn the music up. No, all control over the comfort of my commute is in the hands of the rail network employees now, and it’s a good thing they know how I like my air recycled, dusty and humid. 

By the time we’re arriving at Hornsby my back, recalcitrant at the best of times, is aflame in protest. The seat must surely be made of obsidian! Curious then how it’s able to translate with painful clarity each single kick from the fidgety prick sitting behind me. I can’t concentrate on my crossword for the wheezing, fat ham-beast sat next to me. She perspires just for sitting still, poking at her Kindle and breathing aloud. I dread to wonder what manner of horrid housewife erotica she might be reading as her scarlet tongue flicks over her scabbed top lip.


I give thought to changing seats, but fear that any movement may excite her, like some rabid, prehistoric carnivore, into a frenzy of gnashing teeth and claws so I slide down further into my spine-severing seat and focus all my energies on 4. Down, ‘porcine collective’. A shrill, metallic announcement comes from overhead. We are moments from arrival at Central. Damn, and I thought it was going to be Sarin gas. The Hutt beside me climbs to her feet and hastens cross-eyed for the vestibule, drawn, as if by a tractor beam, to the Hungry Jack’s for second breakfast. The doors open and a rush of warm, fetid air thick with brake dust slaps my face. Is it MondayTuesday or just another day in an eternity of pain and torture?

It’s 7:13am now, and yet my eyes to fall on the Railway Pub as I exit the turnstile. It’s closed now, and perhaps for the better too. I’d need no encouragement to empty that sad watering hole of all the scotch I could before having to face my next trial. Leaving the train station, I drag my leaden feet toward the bus stop. It’s another fifteen minutes on the bus to get from Central to Randwick. It’s raining, I have no umbrella and the line for the 891 to UNSW stands unsheltered to the elements.

Behind me someone is complaining to a disengaged colleague about how poor a decision it was not to build a rail-link. And I’m almost inclined to agree with him but he is confusing state MP’s with federal members, and extolling upon all in earshot his grand plan for the redistribution of wealth so I turn and utter a silent wish that he just drops dead. I shut my eyes tight, clench my fists and wish with all my might that he may buckle under a massive heart attack and die right there on Eddy Avenue. But it doesn’t happen. I open my eyes and there’s no wife widowed or children orphaned. Just the bus. On time oddly enough.

Oh, how they jostle for position! How they elbow to be first on board. It’s like they’ve all taken leave of the fact that it’s a bus. A bus, taking them to work. It’s fine, I stand aside and let them be. I want to be standing anyway so when the great iron sarcophagus comes loose on a bend and overturns, I’ll surely suffer a fatal head injury. Still, no such luck and I arrive at work altogether unscathed.Nearly four hours since getting out of bed I’m arriving at work. 

But, as those brave men and women of the Highway Patrol would have you believe, I’m deserving of this punishment. I’m a vile criminal, a repeat offender no less, and my crime an utter revulsion amongst even the most hirsute of the constabulary. For you see, dear reader, I am a speeder. A hoon, a hooligan, a monster. I am a man who slows down in school zones, I am a man who drives at the speed limit in residential streets. But you see, I have been condemned that my mantra is to slide in behind the wheel for the sole purpose of causing as much reckless pain and harm as humanly possible. My car is a weapon, and thirsts for blood like Idi Amin’s war-wagon. It’s important, nay imperative, that I am removed from the road, lest I go speeding through suburbia at night in some blood-shot, tyre-shredding spree to steal away with every family’s first born son. Perish the thought of punctuality or comfort. Do not be fooled. Speeders are amongst the most debauched and depraved criminal scum out there.

Safe speeding, there’s no such thing. Not for six lane highways, all lanes travelling in the same direction without a stationery object in sight. A limit of 80km/h is already dangerous enough. Truer too, of a sound freeway, from linking Sydney to the Hunter. 110km/h will surely do. And not a single click faster sir, even if are just trying to get home to see your family. It’s a road safety message steeped in scientific credibility. In what sort of crazy, nonsensical world would we train drivers to understand cars at higher speeds and mandate safe road practices to accommodate the speeds which modern cars are more than capable of comfortably achieving? Preposterous! 

I feel a sense of great warmth and safety that my government cares about me enough to set loose the goon squad amongst the hard working commuters like sharks in a seal tank. And grateful too that no man to carry a badge can be reasoned with in human terms. No, I think it’s best that the long arm of the law is a robotic and non-perfunctory one. How blessed we are!And what of the immodest financial penalty for my acts of savagery? Well, I’m given the chance to participate in the great democratic plugging of holes in leaky state government budgets. The patriotism of it all!

Yes, the world truly is a safer place with me off the road. The Richard Ramirez of the road is no longer free to make killing grounds of our roads and clog our mortuaries with his victims.Huzzah for the O’Farrel administration! Huzzah for the nanny state! May we all sleep in sound and sober safety for the enduring vigilance of our masters. 

Thursday, 20 February 2014

Australian Open Comes To A Close


Grand Slam hits a soft spot 

Australian Open Men's Final 2014
Words by Claudia Sorace

The Australian Men’s Open Final is not only iconic, but it stops an entire nation. Making them sit down; either as one of the lucky Rod Laver attendees or pulling up a pew at home. Social media is flooded with patriotic backing: if your grandparents are French for instance; you may be more inclined to want Jo-Wilfred Tsonga to win. What about if you’re Serbian? Well, your white knight Novak Djokovic needs your support and vise versa. Or as a matter of bias, like my mother; she simply has her favorite for reasons beyond nationality, but rather picking her beloved Rafael Nadal in appreciation of his obsessive-compulsive traits and clay court power-madness.


So, you can imagine the hype our house was pumping when Rafael Nadal defeated Roger Federer in the semi finals. But, shockingly we didn’t see wild card Stanislas Wawrinka deafeating Novak Djokovic. A ripple wave of shock occurred when the Swiss player fought his way to a place in the final.

Lets set the scene. It’s Australia Day, the 26th of January and although Australia is a young country with very little tradition, traditionally the Australia Day celebrations were spent watching the tennis with friends and family. Then, you have the players. Rafael Nadal, a man who everyone loves to watch due to his cool, yet exuberantly fit state. Stanislas Wawrinka in the top ten; he’s a volatile player, passionate, yet a ‘Grand Slam’ had seemed unachievable.  However; he crossed the line between ‘can do’ to ‘did do’ when he sent Djokovic packing.

To beat the number one in the world though, was it achievable? Consequently the crowd grew excited at the commencement of the match. However, soon watching Nadal, was like watching a train wreck; he couldn’t fight back, in fact; he couldn’t fight at all. The crowd misunderstood what was happening. Nadal left the court; he took more than the proposed amount of time a player is allowed off court, for private treatment. A crowd, oblivious to what was happening, then booed Nadal when he returned courtside. Wawrinka was complaining; they had not informed him why Nadal had left the court. An argument between the umpire and Wawrinka began. The Swiss player seemed annoyed and exasperated.

Nadal returned to the court and the train wreck continued. Nadal was unable to move, to defend the threatening shots that Wawrinka was hitting from deep within the base line. Wawrinka however, seemed to soften, not quite sure how to react to his injured friend, he then realized that to beat even an injured ‘Rafa’ he would have to be aggressive. In this lapse of uncertainty Nadal was able to win the third set. But, Wawrinka knew that a Grand Slam trophy doesn’t come from being nice. It’s won by putting your opponent in situations, which they cannot recover the ball from.

Wawrinka commenced the final set of slaughter; he began to make Nadal run. Nadals injury somewhat unknown became a little clearer. From appearance and the courtside treatment, a back injury was proposed by compare Jim Courier. It proceeded to get worse; we watch the television as ‘Rafa’ cried courtside, in agony and realization that this Grand Slam was not to be his.

To then add insult to injury (literally) Nadal told his coach, up in the players’ section, ‘Uncle Tony’ in French that it was “over”. ‘Uncle Tony’ however would not let ‘Rafa’ retire; he advised his nephew to complete the match. Nadal did so and thankfully it was all over fairly soon. Wawrinka was playing top form tennis against a bull that had been wounded. Nadal understood how important it was to finish that match, and why? It was paramount that he did. ‘Uncle Tony’ knows the rules of a champion’s code of conduct. Finish the match. If you are able to stand up straight, loose ungracefully, even if you are injured, it is a final, not practice where you can fling her hands in the air and exclaim, “Enough is enough”.

Wawrinka definitely deserved to make it to the final; he played world-class tennis against the world’s no.2. Do we know if he deserved to win the Australian Open 2014? It’s a question we don’t know how to answer. Wawrinka was devastatingly upset about the injury that made the winning the final a walk in the park. Can you feel like a winner if you win by default? I’d say in this case, yes. Wawrinka was playing spectacularly; he was ruthless and hard headed. Nadal’s luck was not on his side the day of the final.

However; ‘Rafa’ is now through to the 3rd round of the Rio Open after pulling out of Buenos Aires to recover from his back injury after the Australian Open and recovering from a stomach bug.

The final may not have been a clash of brilliance. But, if anything is taken away from it, it was a clash of resilience. We saw the world no.1 prove that even through injury; you must not give up until it is game, set and match. As for Wawrinka? Watch that guy, I don’t quite think he’s done just yet.

Below are a compliation of photos by Photographer © Andy Cheung

Wawrinka points out his mental strength as well as physical ability

Nadal's focus on shots waned after his injury became present

Warwinka sliced the ball like a knife 

An Awkward movement cost Nadal his first 2014 Grand Slam

Nadal cries into his arms, as his trainer works on his back injury courtside

Just too painful, Nadal's injury getting the best of him

An emotional Nadal humbly congratulates Wawrinka on his first Grand Slam

Nothing could take the feeling away of joy, even under the circumstances

Sunday, 2 February 2014